The game of metaphysics
Raoni Arroyo, Matteo Morganti

TL;DR
This paper proposes a fictionalist approach to metaphysics that aligns with naturalistic methodology, scientific realism, and instrumentalism, offering a novel perspective on the discipline's aims and methods.
Contribution
It introduces a third option for naturalists, advocating for a fictionalist view of metaphysics that revises traditional understandings while remaining compatible with scientific approaches.
Findings
Fictionalism can be integrated into naturalistic metaphysics.
The approach aligns with scientific realism and instrumentalism.
It offers a new perspective on metaphysical inquiry.
Abstract
Metaphysics is traditionally conceived as aiming at the truth -- indeed, the most fundamental truths about the most general features of reality. Philosophical naturalists, urging that philosophical claims be grounded on science, have often assumed an eliminativist attitude towards metaphysics, consequently paying little attention to such a definition. In the more recent literature, however, naturalism has instead been taken to entail that the traditional conception of metaphysics can be accepted if and only if one is a scientific realist (and puts the right constraints on acceptable metaphysical claims). Here, we want to suggest that naturalists can, and perhaps should, pick a third option, based on a significant yet acceptable revision of the established understanding of metaphysics. More particularly, we will claim that a fictionalist approach to metaphysics is compatible with both…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsScience and Climate Studies · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science
