Engineering Trustworthy AI: A Developer Guide for Empirical Risk Minimization
Diana Pfau, Alexander Jung

TL;DR
This paper provides a developer guide for designing trustworthy AI systems using empirical risk minimization, addressing issues like bias and opacity to meet emerging trust standards.
Contribution
It translates key trustworthiness requirements into practical design choices for ERM-based AI systems, offering actionable guidance.
Findings
Guidelines for incorporating trustworthiness into ERM
Strategies to reduce bias and improve transparency
Framework aligning ERM with trust standards
Abstract
AI systems increasingly shape critical decisions across personal and societal domains. While empirical risk minimization (ERM) drives much of the AI success, it typically prioritizes accuracy over trustworthiness, often resulting in biases, opacity, and other adverse effects. This paper discusses how key requirements for trustworthy AI can be translated into design choices for the components of ERM. We hope to provide actionable guidance for building AI systems that meet emerging standards for trustworthiness of AI.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOccupational Health and Safety Research · Fault Detection and Control Systems · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
