Inference After Ranking with Applications to Economic Mobility
Andreas Petrou-Zeniou, Azeem M. Shaikh

TL;DR
This paper develops a new inference framework for populations ranked within a range of values, extending previous winner-takes-all methods, with applications to economic mobility and validated through simulations.
Contribution
It introduces a two-step inference method for ranking-based population analysis, accommodating broader applications and degeneracy in covariance structures.
Findings
Finite-sample validity in a normal model
Asymptotic uniform validity over distribution classes
Difficulty distinguishing mobility levels after correction
Abstract
This paper considers the problem of inference after ranking. In our setting, we are interested in any population whose rank according to some random quantity, such as an estimated treatment effect, a measure of value-added, or benefit (net of cost), falls in a pre-specified range of values. As such, this framework generalizes the inference on winners setting previously considered in Andrews et al. (2023), in which a winner is understood to be the single population whose rank according to some random quantity is highest. We show that this richer setting accommodates a broad variety of empirically-relevant applications. We develop a two-step method for inference, which we compare to existing methods or their natural generalizations to this setting. We first show the finite-sample validity of this method in a normal location model and then develop asymptotic counterparts to these results…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFirm Innovation and Growth · Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
MethodsSparse Evolutionary Training
