Comparative Analysis of Indicators for Multiobjective Diversity Optimization

TL;DR

This paper compares various diversity indicators for multiobjective optimization, analyzing their theoretical properties, computational complexity, and practical performance within the NOAH evolutionary algorithm framework.

Contribution

It introduces new theoretical results, including NP-hardness proofs, and provides a comprehensive analysis of diversity indicators in multiobjective evolutionary algorithms.

Findings

Riesz s-Energy subset selection is NP-hard.

Different indicators influence search dynamics uniquely.

Proposed NOAH adaptations improve Max-Min indicator performance.

Abstract

Indicator-based (multiobjective) diversity optimization aims at finding a set of near (Pareto-)optimal solutions that maximizes a diversity indicator, where diversity is typically interpreted as the number of essentially different solutions. Whereas, in the first diversity-oriented evolutionary multiobjective optimization algorithm, the NOAH algorithm by Ulrich and Thiele, the Solow Polasky Diversity (also related to Magnitude) served as a metric, other diversity indicators might be considered, such as the parameter-free Max-Min Diversity, and the Riesz s-Energy, which features uniformly distributed solution sets. In this paper, focusing on multiobjective diversity optimization, we discuss different diversity indicators from the perspective of indicator-based evolutionary algorithms (IBEA) with multiple objectives. We examine theoretical, computational, and practical properties of these indicators, such as monotonicity in species, twinning, monotonicity in distance, strict monotonicity in distance, uniformity of maximizing point sets, computational effort for a set of size~n, single-point contributions, subset selection, and submodularity. We present new theorems -- including a proof of the NP-hardness of the Riesz s-Energy Subset Selection Problem -- and consolidate existing results from the literature. In the second part, we apply these indicators in the NOAH algorithm and analyze search dynamics through an example. We examine how optimizing with one indicator affects the performance of others and propose NOAH adaptations specific to the Max-Min indicator.