Developing Consistency Among Undergraduate Graders Scoring Open-Ended Statistics Tasks
Matthew D. Beckman, Sean Burke, Jack Fiochetta, Benjamin Fry, Susan E., Lloyd, Luke Patterson, Elle Tang

TL;DR
This study shows that undergraduate graders can achieve consistent scoring of open-ended statistics tasks through proper training and high-quality rubrics, improving grading reliability in higher education.
Contribution
It provides evidence that undergraduate students can be trained to reliably score open-ended questions, highlighting the importance of training and rubric quality.
Findings
Undergraduate graders can develop substantial agreement with instructors.
Proper training enhances scoring consistency.
High-quality rubrics are crucial for reliable grading.
Abstract
Undergraduate graders are frequently important contributors to the teaching team in post-secondary education settings. This study set out to investigate agreement for a team of undergraduate graders as they acquired training and experience for scoring responses to open-ended tasks. Results demonstrate compelling evidence that undergraduate students can develop the ability to establish and sustain substantial agreement with an instructor, especially when equipped with proper training and a high-quality scoring rubric.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistics Education and Methodologies
