On Regularity and Normalization in Sequential Screening
Ian Ball, Teemu Pekkarinen

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the regularity assumptions in a multi-agent sequential screening model, revealing their limitations and implications for valuation distributions and agent signals.
Contribution
It highlights the non-invariance of regularity assumptions under relabeling and their restrictions on valuation distributions, providing new insights into model assumptions.
Findings
Regularity assumptions are not relabeling invariant.
They exclude valuation distributions with bounded support.
Assumptions imply valuations are signals plus independent noise.
Abstract
We comment on the regularity assumptions in the multi-agent sequential screening model of Eso and Szentes (2007). First, we observe that the regularity assumptions are not invariant to relabeling each agent's signal realizations. Second, we show that the regularity assumptions rule out valuation distributions with common bounded support. Third, we show that if each signal realization is labeled to equal the expected valuation, then the regularity assumptions imply that each agent's valuation is equal to his signal realization plus independent mean-zero noise.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods and Inference
