Quantifying the Risks of Tool-assisted Rephrasing to Linguistic Diversity
Mengying Wang, Andreas Spitz

TL;DR
This paper investigates how widespread use of rephrasing tools and language models might impact linguistic diversity by measuring semantic and vocabulary changes across various domains.
Contribution
It introduces a method to quantify the risk of language reduction caused by rephrasing tools on large-scale human-generated text.
Findings
Rephrasing tools cause measurable semantic shifts.
Vocabulary diversity decreases with tool usage.
Risks vary across different text domains.
Abstract
Writing assistants and large language models see widespread use in the creation of text content. While their effectiveness for individual users has been evaluated in the literature, little is known about their proclivity to change language or reduce its richness when adopted by a large user base. In this paper, we take a first step towards quantifying this risk by measuring the semantic and vocabulary change enacted by the use of rephrasing tools on a multi-domain corpus of human-generated text.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMiddle East and Rwanda Conflicts · Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography
