Does quantum mechanics apply to macroscopic objects? How to define macro?
Ladislaus Alexander B\'anyai

TL;DR
This paper explores whether quantum mechanics applies to macroscopic objects, questioning how to define 'macro' and examining the implications of quantum behavior at large scales.
Contribution
It critically analyzes the ambiguity in defining macroscopic objects in quantum mechanics and discusses the potential for micro-miniaturization to clarify quantum-classical boundaries.
Findings
Quantum wave-packets of macroscopic objects should spread out over time.
Heavy masses are assumed to prevent observable spreading, but this remains unverified.
The paper raises questions about the micro-macro threshold and the role of miniaturization.
Abstract
According to Quantum Mechanics a narrow wave-packet of the center of mass of any macroscopic object should smear out after some time. The problem is usually waved out by assuming that due to their heavy masses this occurs over astronomical times. Without a clear definition of macroscopic objects this remains ambiguous. On the other hand, Quantum Mechanics allows and energetically even prefers largely smeared out c.m. states that never been seen. Why is this the real state of the world we know? Does it suggest a micro-macro threshold with different theoretical descriptions? Does offer micro-miniaturization a hope for answering these questions?
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications
