A Comprehensive Survey and Classification of Evaluation Criteria for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence
Louise McCormack, Malika Bendechache

TL;DR
This paper systematically reviews evaluation criteria for Trustworthy AI, aligning them with EU principles, and proposes a new classification system to aid standardization and governance.
Contribution
It introduces a novel classification system for TAI evaluation criteria, enhancing standardization and governance in AI trustworthiness.
Findings
Identification of current evaluation criteria for TAI
Mapping criteria to EU TAI principles
Highlighting barriers to standardization
Abstract
This paper presents a systematic review of the literature on evaluation criteria for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (TAI), with a focus on the seven EU principles of TAI. This systematic literature review identifies and analyses current evaluation criteria, maps them to the EU TAI principles and proposes a new classification system for each principle. The findings reveal both a need for and significant barriers to standardising criteria for TAI evaluation. The proposed classification contributes to the development, selection and standardization of evaluation criteria for TAI governance.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
MethodsFocus
