On priors and scale cuts in EFT-based full-shape analyses
Anton Chudaykin, Mikhail M. Ivanov, Takahiro Nishimichi

TL;DR
This paper investigates how priors and scale cuts in EFT-based full-shape galaxy survey analyses can introduce systematic biases, especially due to two-loop corrections, affecting the accuracy of cosmological parameter estimation.
Contribution
It extends previous studies by analyzing the impact of analysis choices, particularly scale cuts, on parameter biases using high-fidelity simulation data, highlighting the importance of careful analysis design.
Findings
Scale cuts can bias parameters, overestimating σ8 by over 5%.
Different analysis codes (PyBird vs. CLASS-PT) show varying bias levels.
Two-loop corrections cause systematic biases that do not diminish with better priors.
Abstract
Parameter estimation from galaxy survey data from the full-shape method depends on scale cuts and priors on EFT parameters. The effects of priors, including the so-called ''prior volume'' phenomenon have been originally studied in Ivanov et al. (2019) and subsequent works. In this note, we repeat and extend these tests and also apply them to other priors used in the literature. We point out that in addition to the ''prior volume'' effect there is a more dangerous effect that is largely overlooked: a systematic bias on cosmological parameters due to overoptimistic scale cuts. Unlike the ''prior volume'' effect, this is a genuine systematic bias due to two-loop corrections that does not vanish with better priors or with larger data volumes. Our study is based on the high fidelity BOSS-like PT Challenge simulation data which offer many advantages over analyses based on synthetic data…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOptical measurement and interference techniques · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
