Are Bayesian networks typically faithful?
Philip Boeken, Patrick Forr\'e, Joris M. Mooij

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that faithfulness is a typical property in various classes of Bayesian networks, supporting its common use in causal inference and validating the effectiveness of constraint-based causal discovery algorithms.
Contribution
The paper extends existing results by proving faithfulness is dense and open in broader classes of Bayesian networks, including nonparametric models and those with latent variables.
Findings
Faithfulness is dense and open in Bayesian networks over a fixed DAG.
Faithful parameters have Lebesgue measure zero in exponential family models.
Constraint-based causal discovery algorithms are consistent on a typical set of networks.
Abstract
Faithfulness is a common assumption in causal inference, often motivated by the fact that the faithful parameters of linear Gaussian and discrete Bayesian networks are typical, and the folklore belief that this should also hold for other classes of Bayesian networks. We address this open question by showing that among all Bayesian networks over a given DAG, the faithful Bayesian networks are indeed `typical': they constitute a dense, open set with respect to the total variation metric. This does not directly imply that faithfulness is typical in restricted classes of Bayesian networks that are often considered in statistical applications. To this end we consider the class of Bayesian networks parametrised by conditional exponential families, for which we show that under regularity conditions, the faithful parameters constitute a dense and open set, the unfaithful parameters have…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Methods and Mixture Models · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
MethodsSparse Evolutionary Training
