
TL;DR
This paper explores variants of Solovay reducibility, establishing their relationships and differences, especially in the context of randomness notions like Martin-Löf and Schnorr, and introduces new results on their properties.
Contribution
It derives new results connecting different variants of Solovay reducibility, showing implications between rational and real function-based definitions, and clarifies their hierarchy.
Findings
Solovay reducibility on rationals implies on reals
Original Solovay reducibility is weaker than its monotone variant
Total Solovay reducibility on rationals implies on reals
Abstract
Outside of the left-c.e. reals, Solovay reducibility is considered to be behaved badly [10.1007/978-0-387-68441-3]. Proposals for variants of Solovay reducibility that are better suited for the investigation of arbitrary, not necessarily left-c.e. reals were made by Rettinger and Zheng [10.1007/978-3-540-27798-9_39], and, recently, by Titov [10.11588/heidok.00034250] and by Kumabe and co-authors [10.4115/jla.2020.12.2; 10.3233/COM-230486]. These variants all coincide with the original version of Solovay reducibility on the left-c.e. reals. Furthermore, they are all defined in terms of translation functions. The latter translate between computable approximations in the case of Rettinger and Zheng, are monotone in the case of Titov, and are functions between reals in the case of Kumabe et al. In what follows, we derive new results on the mentioned variants and their relation to each…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory
