Are LLMs Good Zero-Shot Fallacy Classifiers?
Fengjun Pan, Xiaobao Wu, Zongrui Li, Anh Tuan Luu

TL;DR
This paper investigates the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for zero-shot fallacy classification, demonstrating their potential to outperform traditional models especially in out-of-distribution scenarios through innovative prompting strategies.
Contribution
It introduces diverse single-round and multi-round prompting schemes to enhance LLMs' zero-shot fallacy detection capabilities, especially for smaller models.
Findings
LLMs achieve acceptable zero-shot performance compared to full-shot baselines.
Multi-round prompting improves accuracy, notably for small LLMs.
LLMs outperform baselines in out-of-distribution and open-domain tasks.
Abstract
Fallacies are defective arguments with faulty reasoning. Detecting and classifying them is a crucial NLP task to prevent misinformation, manipulative claims, and biased decisions. However, existing fallacy classifiers are limited by the requirement for sufficient labeled data for training, which hinders their out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization abilities. In this paper, we focus on leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) for zero-shot fallacy classification. To elicit fallacy-related knowledge and reasoning abilities of LLMs, we propose diverse single-round and multi-round prompting schemes, applying different task-specific instructions such as extraction, summarization, and Chain-of-Thought reasoning. With comprehensive experiments on benchmark datasets, we suggest that LLMs could be potential zero-shot fallacy classifiers. In general, LLMs under single-round prompting schemes…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning and Data Classification · Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques · Natural Language Processing Techniques
MethodsFocus
