A problem with the conservation law observed in macroscopic quantum phenomena is a consequence of violation of the correspondence principle
A.V. Nikulov

TL;DR
This paper argues that macroscopic quantum phenomena, such as superconductivity, violate the correspondence principle and the second law of thermodynamics due to quantization effects that alter angular momentum and energy at a macroscopic scale.
Contribution
It highlights a fundamental contradiction between macroscopic quantum phenomena and the correspondence principle, challenging traditional interpretations of superconductivity and superfluidity.
Findings
Macroscopic quantum phenomena violate the correspondence principle.
Quantization affects angular momentum and energy in superconductors.
Contradictions with the second law of thermodynamics are identified.
Abstract
This article draws attention that the puzzle of the change of the angular momentum without any force is a consequence of the contradiction of macroscopic quantum phenomena with the correspondence principle, which reveals a fundamental difference between microscopic quantum phenomena, described by the Schrodinger wave mechanics, and macroscopic quantum phenomena, described by the theory of superconductivity and the theory of superfluidity. To explain why macroscopic quantum phenomena are observed despite the correspondence principle, Lev Landau postulated in 1941 that microscopic particles in superfluid helium and superconductor cannot move separately. The angular momentum can change without any force only due to quantization in both microscopic and macroscopic quantum phenomena. The Heisenberg uncertainty principle eliminates the contradiction with the conservation law in the first…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
