The Equivalence Principle is NOT a Noether Symmetry
Andronikos Paliathanasis

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the claimed link between the Equivalence Principle and Noether's theorem, demonstrating that they are independent concepts and clarifying misconceptions in previous analyses.
Contribution
It provides a detailed critique of prior work, showing no connection exists between the Equivalence Principle and Noether's theorem, and offers insights to improve symmetry analysis.
Findings
No connection between Noether's theorem and the Equivalence Principle.
Critique of previous analysis highlighting flaws.
Guidelines for accurate symmetry analysis.
Abstract
The connection between the Equivalence Principle and Noether's theorem was discussed in S. Capozziello and C. Ferrara, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 21, 2440014 (2024). However, it is known that the Noether symmetry condition is independent of the equations of motions as follows from Hamilton's Principle. In this paper, we critically examine the analysis presented in the aforementioned work, highlighting its flaws, and provide a detailed demonstration that there is no connection between Noether's theorem and the Equivalence Principle. Furthermore, we offer various insights on symmetry analysis to prevent the perpetuation of inaccuracies regarding Noether's work.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
