Kinematical signatures: Distinguishing between warps and radial flows
A. Zuleta, T. Birnstiel, R. Teague

TL;DR
This paper enhances the modeling of warped and radially flowing disks by extending the $ exttt{eddy}$ package, enabling accurate parameter recovery and providing criteria to distinguish between different disk kinematics.
Contribution
The study introduces an extended $ exttt{eddy}$ tool that models warped geometries and radial flows, improving the ability to differentiate between these kinematic features in disk observations.
Findings
$ exttt{eddy}$ accurately recovers disk parameters with sufficient resolution.
Fitting incorrect models produces residuals that help classify disk kinematics.
The method is robust against typical ALMA thermal noise levels.
Abstract
Increasing evidence shows that warped disks are common, challenging the methods used to model their velocity fields. Molecular line emission of these disks is characterized by a twisted pattern, similar to the signal from radial flows, complicating the study of warped disk kinematics. Previous attempts to model these features have encountered difficulties in distinguishing between the underlying kinematics of different disks. This study aims to advance gas kinematics modeling capabilities by extending the Extracting Disk Dynamics () package to include warped geometries and radial flows. We assess the performance of in recovering input parameters for scenarios involving warps, radial flows, and combinations of the two. Additionally, we provide a basis to break the visual degeneracy between warped disks and radial flow, establishing a criterion to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsImage Processing and 3D Reconstruction
