
TL;DR
This paper reviews the main theories of planet formation, focusing on disk instability and core accretion, and aims to clarify their physical principles despite observational challenges.
Contribution
It provides an intuitive overview of planet formation mechanisms, emphasizing physical principles behind disk instability and core accretion models.
Findings
Disk instability involves direct formation of giant planets from disk fragmentation.
Core accretion describes a bottom-up growth of planets from solid bodies to gas accretion.
The review clarifies physical processes underlying planet formation models.
Abstract
Planet formation encompasses processes that span a remarkable 40 magnitudes in mass, ranging from collisions between micron-sized grains inherited from the ISM to the accretion of gas by giant planets. The planet formation process takes place in the interior of dusty disks, which offer us only limited observational constraints. Historically, the two main paradigms describing planet formation are the disk instability and core accretion models. In the former giant planets condense directly form a disk massive enough to fragments under its own self-gravity. In contrast, the core accretion model follows a bottom-up approach driven by the growth of solid bodies. The core accretion model includes the direct growth phase, where pebble and possibly planetesimal sized bodies form by surface-driven processes. Alternatively, planetesimal bodies can emerge from instabilities in the solid…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstro and Planetary Science · Astronomy and Astrophysical Research · Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
