Pull-in features of nanoswitches in the Casimir regime with account of contact repulsion
G. L. Klimchitskaya, A. S. Korotkov, V. V. Loboda, and V. M., Mostepanenko

TL;DR
This study investigates the pull-in behavior of nanoswitches in the Casimir regime, showing that contact repulsion prevents collapse and enables stable cyclic operation.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive model accounting for electrostatic, van der Waals, and contact repulsive forces, revealing stable nanoswitch operation with contact repulsion considered.
Findings
Casimir force causes pull-in at short separations without contact repulsion.
Contact repulsion prevents collapse, enabling stable cyclic switching.
Nanoswitch stability depends on including contact repulsive forces in the model.
Abstract
The cantilever tip of a nanoswitch in close proximity to the ground plate is considered with account of electrostatic, elastic, van der Waals (Casimir), and also contact repulsive forces. The van der Waals (Casimir) and contact repulsive forces are computed for a Si cantilever and either Au or Ni ground plates using the Lifshitz theory and the method of pairwise summation with account of surface roughness. It is shown that at short separations an impact of the van der Waals (Casimir) force leads to the pull-in and collapse of a cantilever onto the ground plate if the contact repulsion is disregarded. Taking into consideration contact repulsion, the nanoswitch is demonstrated to have the stable cyclic behavior with no pull-in when switching voltage on and off.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
