BayeSN and SALT: A Comparison of Dust Inference Across SN Ia Light-curve Models with DES5YR
Matthew Grayling, Brodie Popovic

TL;DR
This study validates the BayeSN model against SALT for dust inference in SNe Ia, demonstrating its effectiveness in disentangling dust effects from intrinsic properties and revealing intrinsic contributions to the mass step.
Contribution
It provides the first validation of BayeSN on SALT-based simulations and applies it to DES5YR data to analyze dust and intrinsic differences in SNe Ia.
Findings
BayeSN accurately recovers simulated dust and intrinsic parameters.
Bias in dust inference caused by misclassification of dust-affected SNe.
Evidence for intrinsic contributions to the mass step and environmental effects on SN light curves.
Abstract
In recent years there has been significant debate around the impact of dust on SNe Ia, a major source of uncertainty in cosmological analyses. We perform the first validation of the probabilistic hierarchical SN Ia SED model BayeSN on the conventional SALT model, an important test given the history of conflicting conclusions regarding the distributions of host galaxy dust properties between the two. Applying BayeSN to SALT-based simulations, we find that BayeSN is able to accurately recover our simulated inputs and successfully disentangle differences in dust extinction from an intrinsic mass step. This validates BayeSN as a method to identify the relative contributions of dust and intrinsic differences in explaining the mass step. When inferring dust parameters with simulated samples including non-Ia contamination, we find that our choice of photometric classifier causes a bias in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
