Counterfactual Generative Modeling with Variational Causal Inference
Yulun Wu, Louie McConnell, Claudia Iriondo

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel variational Bayesian framework for counterfactual generative modeling that effectively predicts individual outcomes under interventions, especially with high-dimensional data and limited covariates.
Contribution
It proposes a new theoretical framework that enables end-to-end counterfactual supervision without counterfactual samples and promotes disentangled noise for causal effect identification.
Findings
Outperforms state-of-the-art models on multiple benchmarks.
Effectively handles high-dimensional outcomes with limited covariates.
Enables counterfactual prediction without requiring counterfactual data.
Abstract
Estimating an individual's counterfactual outcomes under interventions is a challenging task for traditional causal inference and supervised learning approaches when the outcome is high-dimensional (e.g. gene expressions, facial images) and covariates are relatively limited. In this case, to predict one's outcomes under counterfactual treatments, it is crucial to leverage individual information contained in the observed outcome in addition to the covariates. Prior works using variational inference in counterfactual generative modeling have been focusing on neural adaptations and model variants within the conditional variational autoencoder formulation, which we argue is fundamentally ill-suited to the notion of counterfactual in causal inference. In this work, we present a novel variational Bayesian causal inference framework and its theoretical backings to properly handle…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2025 Poster
The work is theoretically grounded.
The manuscript should properly discuss the previous works, such as CEVAE, in the main paper. Figure 1 could be more specified with additional links that indicate the inference network in the VAEs. If the proposed method has novelty or contribution in terms of latent identifiability and disentanglement, appropriate experiments should be conducted with fair comparison against the works within such sub-fields. What I am concerned about is the following. I found that this paper is an extension of
- Overall, I believe this work sets forth a very interesting formulation for counterfactual inference in generative models and criticizes the use of conditional generative models for counterfactual generation. - The VCI framework is formulated well and the consistency assumption to ensure counterfactuals keep individual components of the factual but also reflect changes according to a treatment is intuitive. - The theoretical results for ELBO derivation, identifiability, and disentanglement furt
- It seems that the Effectiveness metric from [1] is utilized through the MAE, where an anti-causal predictor is trained to predict the values of thickness and intensity, and a counterfactual reconstruction is fed in for evaluation. I believe this to be a sound metric. However, I do not think the MSE between the true and generated images is necessarily a good metric to evaluate the quality of the counterfactual. The MSE evaluates a pixel-wise similarity between the two images. However, in a coun
The formulation is sound. Figure 2 is particularly helpful in explaining the model and setup.
While the formulation is sound, the terminology of "causal reasoning" is questionable. One could argue that you are performing imputation of missing data, and then conditioning on the observed data makes complete sense. The criticism of the CEVAE is inappropriate, because they are solving a very different problem (traditional causal inference), and they do not condition on specific observations (the predictions are not "personalized"). It is ok to comment on and compare to CEVAE, but the setup a
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSimulation Techniques and Applications · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
MethodsVariational Inference · Causal inference
