Boosting Logical Fallacy Reasoning in LLMs via Logical Structure Tree
Yuanyuan Lei, Ruihong Huang

TL;DR
This paper introduces a logical structure tree to improve logical fallacy detection in LLMs by explicitly modeling hierarchical logical relations, leading to significant performance improvements.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel unsupervised method to construct logical structure trees and integrates them into LLMs for enhanced fallacy reasoning.
Findings
Improved precision and recall in fallacy detection
Effective use of logical structure trees as prompts
Significant performance gains over baseline models
Abstract
Logical fallacy uses invalid or faulty reasoning in the construction of a statement. Despite the prevalence and harmfulness of logical fallacies, detecting and classifying logical fallacies still remains a challenging task. We observe that logical fallacies often use connective words to indicate an intended logical relation between two arguments, while the argument semantics does not actually support the logical relation. Inspired by this observation, we propose to build a logical structure tree to explicitly represent and track the hierarchical logic flow among relation connectives and their arguments in a statement. Specifically, this logical structure tree is constructed in an unsupervised manner guided by the constituency tree and a taxonomy of connectives for ten common logical relations, with relation connectives as non-terminal nodes and textual arguments as terminal nodes, and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNatural Language Processing Techniques · Semantic Web and Ontologies
