Embedded Model Form Uncertainty Quantification with Measurement Noise for Bayesian Model Calibration
Daniel Andr\'es Arcones, Martin Weiser, Phaedon-Stelios Koutsourelakis, J\"org F. Unger

TL;DR
This paper develops an interpretable Bayesian framework that incorporates model form uncertainty and measurement noise to improve calibration and uncertainty quantification in physical system simulations.
Contribution
It introduces a novel, more interpretable method for embedding model inadequacy and adapts likelihood models to account for measurement noise, enhancing uncertainty propagation.
Findings
Improved uncertainty quantification in model predictions.
Effective handling of measurement noise and outliers.
Application to thermal simulation demonstrates practical utility.
Abstract
A key factor in ensuring the accuracy of computer simulations that model physical systems is the proper calibration of their parameters based on real-world observations or experimental data. Inevitably, uncertainties arise, and Bayesian methods provide a robust framework for quantifying and propagating these uncertainties to model predictions. Nevertheless, Bayesian methods paired with inexact models usually produce predictions unable to represent the observed datapoints. Additionally, the quantified uncertainties of these overconfident models cannot be propagated to other Quantities of Interest (QoIs) reliably. A promising solution involves embedding a model inadequacy term in the inference parameters, allowing the quantified model form uncertainty to influence non-observed QoIs. This paper introduces a more interpretable framework for embedding the model inadequacy compared to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
