Are uncloneable proof and advice states strictly necessary?
Rohit Chatterjee, Srijita Kundu, Supartha Podder

TL;DR
This paper introduces and studies the necessity of uncloneable quantum proofs and advice, defining stronger classes that require proofs or advice states to be inherently uncloneable, and demonstrates their existence and separation results in quantum complexity theory.
Contribution
It defines strictly uncloneable quantum complexity classes and proves their existence and separations in the quantum oracle model and unconditionally.
Findings
Existence of languages in strictly uncloneable QMA and BQP/qpoly in the quantum oracle model.
Quantum oracle separation between QMA and cloneableQMA.
Unconditional inclusion of a language in strictly uncloneable FEQP/qpoly.
Abstract
Yes, we show that they are. We initiate the study of languages that necessarily need uncloneable quantum proofs and advice. We define strictly uncloneable versions of the classes QMA, BQP/qpoly and FEQP/qpoly (which is the class of relational problems solvable exactly with polynomial-sized quantum advice). Strictly uncloneable QMA is defined to be the class of languages in QMA that only have uncloneable proofs, i.e., given any family of candidate proof states, a polynomial-time cloning algorithm cannot act on it to produce states that are jointly usable by separate polynomial-time verifiers, for arbitrary polynomial . This is a stronger notion of uncloneable proofs and advice than those considered in previous works, which only required the existence of a single family of proof or advice states that are uncloneable. We show that in the quantum oracle model, there exist languages…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBiomedical Ethics and Regulation
