Enhancing Statistical Validity and Power in Hybrid Controlled Trials: A Randomization Inference Approach with Conformal Selective Borrowing
Ke Zhu, Shu Yang, Xiaofei Wang

TL;DR
This paper introduces a randomization inference framework with conformal selective borrowing to enhance statistical validity and power in hybrid controlled trials using external data, especially in small-sample settings.
Contribution
It develops a finite-sample exact, model-free testing procedure that adaptively borrows external controls while controlling type I error and optimizing power.
Findings
Validates the method through simulations.
Demonstrates improved power in a lung cancer trial.
Ensures robust inference with external data integration.
Abstract
External controls from historical trials or observational data can augment randomized controlled trials when large-scale randomization is impractical or unethical, such as in drug evaluation for rare diseases. However, non-randomized external controls can introduce biases, and existing Bayesian and frequentist methods may inflate the type I error rate, particularly in small-sample trials where external data borrowing is most critical. To address these challenges, we propose a randomization inference framework that ensures finite-sample exact and model-free type I error rate control, adhering to the "analyze as you randomize" principle to safeguard against hidden biases. Recognizing that biased external controls reduce the power of randomization tests, we leverage conformal inference to develop an individualized test-then-pool procedure that selectively borrows comparable external…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials
