Reading Yule in light of the history and present of macroevolution

TL;DR

This paper reviews Yule's 1925 stochastic model of biodiversity, analyzing its historical significance, mathematical foundations, and ongoing relevance to macroevolutionary challenges like taxonomy and species diversity.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive analysis of Yule's original work, its mathematical derivations, and its influence on modern macroevolutionary theory and practice.

Findings

Yule's model explained species distribution across genera.

Historical analysis reveals persistent challenges in macroevolutionary taxonomy.

Modern perspectives critique and extend Yule's assumptions.

Abstract

Yule's 1925 paper introducing the branching model that bears his name was a landmark contribution to the biodiversity sciences. In his paper, Yule developed stochastic models to explain the observed distribution of species across genera and to test hypotheses about the relationship between clade age, diversity, and geographic range. Here we discuss the intellectual context in which Yule produced this work, highlight Yule's key mathematical and conceptual contributions using both his and more modern derivations, and critically examine some of the assumptions of his work through a modern lens. We then document the strange trajectory of his work through the history of macroevolutionary thought and discuss how the fundamental challenges he grappled with -- such as defining higher taxa, linking microevolutionary population dynamics to macroevolutionary rates, and accounting for inconsistent taxonomic practices -- remain with us a century later.