Beyond the Median Voter: A Model of How the Ideological Dimension Shapes Party Polarization
Roberto Venegeroles

TL;DR
This paper presents a mathematical model showing how the dimensionality of ideological space influences party polarization, explaining paradoxes in voter and party behavior and revealing a phase transition akin to ferromagnetism.
Contribution
It introduces a multidimensional ideological model that explains party polarization dynamics and the impact of ideological complexity on political behavior.
Findings
Lower ideological dimensions increase party polarization.
Issue polarization among voters has a secondary effect.
The model predicts a phase transition in party positioning.
Abstract
Defying the median voter theorem, party polarization has spread globally, especially in the United States. As concerns grow over its risks to democracy, political science has probed its causes, revealing two paradoxes: while polarization between U.S. political parties has undeniably increased since the 1970s, the corresponding rise in issue polarization among voters remains contested; moreover, the growing number of politically relevant issues would be expected to counteract party polarization rather than reinforce it. To examine these findings theoretically, we analyze a mathematical model of bipartisan elections where voters and parties interact in a multidimensional ideological space. We derive equations that determine the critical threshold of expected voter support needed for a party to find it strategically advantageous to position itself at the center or outside of it. This…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
