Elementary equivalence of endomorphism rings and automorphism groups of periodic Abelian groups
Elena Bunina

TL;DR
This paper characterizes when the endomorphism rings and automorphism groups of periodic Abelian groups are elementarily equivalent, based on properties of their p-components and second-order logic equivalences.
Contribution
It establishes precise criteria linking elementary equivalence of endomorphism rings and automorphism groups to properties of p-components and second-order logic.
Findings
Endomorphism rings are elementarily equivalent iff p-components are.
Automorphism groups are elementarily equivalent under specific conditions.
Automorphism groups and endomorphism rings are equivalent when p-components are.
Abstract
In this paper, we prove that the endomorphism rings End A and End A' of periodic infinite Abelian groups A and A' are elementarily equivalent if and only if the endomorphism rings of their p-components are elementarily equivalent for all primes p. Additionally, we show that the automorphism groups Aut A and Aut A' of periodic Abelian groups A and A' that do not have 2-components and do not contain cocyclic p-components are elementarily equivalent if and only if, for any prime p, the corresponding p-components A_p and A_p' of A and A' are equivalent in second-order logic if they are not reduced, and are equivalent in second-order logic bounded by the cardinalities of their basic subgroups if they are reduced. For such groups A and A', their automorphism groups are elementarily equivalent if and only if their endomorphism rings are elementarily equivalent, and the automorphism groups of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory · Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
