The Atacama Cosmology Telescope DR6 and DESI: Structure growth measurements from the cross-correlation of DESI Legacy Imaging galaxies and CMB lensing from ACT DR6 and Planck PR4

TL;DR

This paper measures the growth of cosmic structures between redshifts 0.3 and 0.8 by cross-correlating ACT DR6 CMB lensing maps with DESI galaxy data, providing constraints consistent with galaxy lensing but lower than Planck predictions.

Contribution

First to use ACT DR6 and DESI galaxy data for large-scale structure growth measurements across multiple redshifts with a focus on linear scales.

Findings

Measured $S_8$ using ACT data alone: 0.772 ± 0.040.

Combined ACT and Planck data yield $S_8=0.765±0.032$.

Detected a ~2σ tension at the lowest redshift bin with other bins.

Abstract

We measure the growth of cosmic density fluctuations on large scales and across the redshift range $0.3<z<0.8$ through the cross-correlation of the ACT DR6 CMB lensing map and galaxies from the DESI Legacy Survey, using three galaxy samples spanning the redshifts of $0.3 \lesssim z \lesssim 0.45$, $0.45 \lesssim z \lesssim0.6$, $0.6 \lesssim z \lesssim 0.8$. We adopt a scale cut where non-linear effects are negligible, so that the cosmological constraints are derived from the linear regime. We determine the amplitude of matter fluctuations over all three redshift bins using ACT data alone to be $S_8\equiv\sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5}=0.772\pm0.040$ in a joint analysis combining the three redshift bins and ACT lensing alone. Using a combination of ACT and \textit{Planck} data we obtain $S_8=0.765\pm0.032$. The lowest redshift bin used is the least constraining and exhibits a $\sim2\sigma$ tension with the other redshift bins; thus we also report constraints excluding the first redshift bin, giving $S_8=0.785\pm0.033$ for the combination of ACT and \textit{Planck}. This result is in excellent agreement at the $0.3\sigma$ level with measurements from galaxy lensing, but is $1.8\sigma$ lower than predictions based on \textit{Planck} primary CMB data. Understanding whether this hint of discrepancy in the growth of structure at low redshifts arises from a fluctuation, from systematics in data, or from new physics, is a high priority for forthcoming CMB lensing and galaxy cross-correlation analyses.