Functional Flexibility in Generative AI Interfaces: Text Editing with LLMs through Conversations, Toolbars, and Prompts
Florian Lehmann, Daniel Buschek

TL;DR
This paper investigates how different user interfaces influence the way users access and utilize the flexible functions of large language models, combining surveys, user studies, and UI design insights.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of functional flexibility as a theoretical framework and compares conversational, toolbar, and prompt-based UIs for interacting with LLMs.
Findings
Users prefer short command prompts for AI interaction.
Toolbar shortcuts enable dynamic switching between AI functions.
Different UIs shape user access to AI capabilities.
Abstract
Prompting-based user interfaces (UIs) shift the task of defining and accessing relevant functions from developers to users. However, how UIs shape this flexibility has not yet been investigated explicitly. We explored interaction with Large Language Models (LLMs) over four years, before and after the rise of general-purpose LLMs: (1) Our survey (N=121) elicited how users envision to delegate writing tasks to AI. This informed a conversational UI design. (2) A user study (N=10) revealed that people regressed to using short command-like prompts. (3) When providing these directly as shortcuts in a toolbar UI, in addition to prompting, users in our second study (N=12) dynamically switched between specified and flexible AI functions. We discuss functional flexibility as a new theoretical construct and thinking tool. Our work highlights the value of moving beyond conversational UIs, by…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNatural Language Processing Techniques · Topic Modeling
