CoMAT: Chain of Mathematically Annotated Thought Improves Mathematical Reasoning
Joshua Ong Jun Leang, Aryo Pradipta Gema, Shay B. Cohen

TL;DR
CoMAT introduces a two-stage reasoning approach that converts natural language problems into symbolic form and executes reasoning within a single LLM, significantly improving mathematical reasoning accuracy and transparency.
Contribution
It proposes CoMAT, a novel method that enhances mathematical reasoning by combining symbolic conversion and reasoning execution within one LLM, without external tools.
Findings
Outperforms traditional CoT on six of seven benchmarks.
Achieves 4.48% improvement on MMLU-Redux (MATH).
Achieves 4.58% improvement on GaoKao MCQ.
Abstract
Mathematical reasoning remains a significant challenge for large language models (LLMs), despite progress in prompting techniques such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT). We present **Chain of Mathematically Annotated Thought (CoMAT)**, which enhances reasoning through two stages: *Symbolic Conversion* (converting natural language queries into symbolic form) and *Reasoning Execution* (deriving answers from symbolic representations). CoMAT operates entirely with a single LLM and without external solvers. Across four LLMs, CoMAT outperforms traditional CoT on six out of seven benchmarks, achieving gains of 4.48% on MMLU-Redux (MATH) and 4.58% on GaoKao MCQ. In addition to improved performance, CoMAT ensures faithfulness and verifiability, offering a transparent reasoning process for complex mathematical tasks
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning · Mathematics Education and Pedagogy · Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
