Candidate Monotonicity and Proportionality for Lotteries and Non-Resolute Rules
Jannik Peters

TL;DR
This paper investigates the design of multiwinner voting rules that ensure candidate monotonicity and proportionality, demonstrating that certain rules can be adapted to satisfy both properties simultaneously.
Contribution
It proves that committees satisfying proportionality for solid coalitions are candidate monotone and adapts Phragmén's Ordered Rule into a candidate monotone probabilistic rule.
Findings
Proportional committees are candidate monotone.
Phragmén's Ordered Rule can be made candidate monotone.
The study advances multiwinner voting rule design.
Abstract
We study the problem of designing multiwinner voting rules that are candidate monotone and proportional. We show that the set of committees satisfying the proportionality axiom of proportionality for solid coalitions is candidate monotone. We further show that Phragm\'en's Ordered Rule can be turned into a candidate monotone probabilistic rule which randomizes over committees satisfying proportionality for solid coalitions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Voting Systems · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Auction Theory and Applications
