Deep Transfer Learning: Model Framework and Error Analysis

TL;DR

This paper introduces a deep transfer learning framework that leverages multi-domain data to improve downstream task performance, with features for automatic domain feature identification and enhanced interpretability, supported by theoretical error analysis and empirical validation.

Contribution

It proposes a novel deep transfer learning framework with automatic feature identification and interpretability, along with theoretical error bounds and empirical validation.

Findings

Significantly improves convergence rates for Lipschitz functions in downstream tasks.

Reduces error bounds from no transfer to partial and complete transfer scenarios.

Validated effectiveness on image classification and regression datasets.

Abstract

This paper presents a framework for deep transfer learning, which aims to leverage information from multi-domain upstream data with a large number of samples $n$ to a single-domain downstream task with a considerably smaller number of samples $m$, where $m \ll n$, in order to enhance performance on downstream task. Our framework offers several intriguing features. First, it allows the existence of both shared and domain-specific features across multi-domain data and provides a framework for automatic identification, achieving precise transfer and utilization of information. Second, the framework explicitly identifies upstream features that contribute to downstream tasks, establishing clear relationships between upstream domains and downstream tasks, thereby enhancing interpretability. Error analysis shows that our framework can significantly improve the convergence rate for learning Lipschitz functions in downstream supervised tasks, reducing it from $\tilde{O}(m^{-\frac{1}{2(d+2)}}+n^{-\frac{1}{2(d+2)}})$ ("no transfer") to $\tilde{O}(m^{-\frac{1}{2(d^*+3)}} + n^{-\frac{1}{2(d+2)}})$ ("partial transfer"), and even to $\tilde{O}(m^{-1/2}+n^{-\frac{1}{2(d+2)}})$ ("complete transfer"), where $d^* \ll d$ and $d$ is the dimension of the observed data. Our theoretical findings are supported by empirical experiments on image classification and regression datasets.