The Condorcet Dimension of Metric Spaces
Alexandra Lassota, Adrian Vetta, Bernhard von Stengel

TL;DR
This paper investigates the Condorcet dimension in spatial voting models, establishing that in two-dimensional proximity-based elections, the minimum size of a Condorcet winning set is at most three, under common distance norms.
Contribution
It proves that the Condorcet dimension is at most three in 2D metric spaces with proximity preferences, extending understanding of voting stability in spatial models.
Findings
Condorcet dimension is at most 3 in 2D proximity elections.
Results hold under Manhattan and infinity norms.
Advances theoretical understanding of voting stability in spatial settings.
Abstract
A Condorcet winning set is a set of candidates such that no other candidate is preferred by at least half the voters over all members of the set. The Condorcet dimension, which is the minimum cardinality of a Condorcet winning set, is known to be at most logarithmic in the number of candidates. We study the case of elections where voters and candidates are located in a -dimensional space with preferences based upon proximity voting. Our main result is that the Condorcet dimension is at most , under both the Manhattan norm and the infinity norm, natural measures in electoral systems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFuzzy and Soft Set Theory · Fixed Point Theorems Analysis · Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
