$\omega$-consistency for Different Arrays of Quantifiers
Paulo Guilherme Santos

TL;DR
This paper explores the formalization of $ ext{v}$ statements with various quantifier arrays, establishing their equivalence to $ ext{omega}$-consistency statements and developing a truth theory that proves these statements.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach to formalize $ ext{v}$ statements with different quantifier arrays and shows their equivalence to $ ext{omega}$-consistency within a basis theory.
Findings
Certain quantifier arrays yield consistency statements equivalent to $ ext{omega}$-consistency.
A new theory of truth is constructed that proves all $ ext{omega}$-consistency statements.
The results deepen understanding of the relationship between quantifier structures and consistency.
Abstract
We study the formalized v statement by allowing the occurrence of different arrays of quantifiers in it. We prove that for some specific arrays of quantifiers we get consistency statements that are S-equivalent to the original -consistency statement (S denotes the basis theory to develop metamathematics). We end our paper by creating a theory of truth that proves each -consistency-statement.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Algorithms and Data Compression · semigroups and automata theory
