AutoPersuade: A Framework for Evaluating and Explaining Persuasive Arguments
Till Raphael Saenger, Musashi Hinck, Justin Grimmer, Brandon M., Stewart

TL;DR
AutoPersuade is a comprehensive framework that constructs, evaluates, and explains persuasive arguments using a new dataset, a topic model for feature identification, and effectiveness prediction validated through human studies.
Contribution
It introduces a novel three-part framework combining dataset curation, topic modeling, and causal analysis for persuasive argument evaluation and explanation.
Findings
Effective prediction of argument persuasiveness
Validated with human studies on veganism arguments
Outperforms baseline models in effectiveness prediction
Abstract
We introduce AutoPersuade, a three-part framework for constructing persuasive messages. First, we curate a large dataset of arguments with human evaluations. Next, we develop a novel topic model to identify argument features that influence persuasiveness. Finally, we use this model to predict the effectiveness of new arguments and assess the causal impact of different components to provide explanations. We validate AutoPersuade through an experimental study on arguments for veganism, demonstrating its effectiveness with human studies and out-of-sample predictions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSoftware Engineering Research · Information and Cyber Security · Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
