Connecting integrated RGB mass loss from asteroseismology and globular clusters
K. Brogaard, A. Miglio, W. E. van Rossem, E. Willett, and J. S., Thomsen

TL;DR
This study uses asteroseismology and stellar data to measure RGB mass loss in Milky Way field stars and globular clusters, revealing its dependence on metallicity and challenging simple mass-loss models.
Contribution
It provides the first empirical comparison of RGB mass loss between field stars and globular clusters across different metallicities.
Findings
RGB mass loss increases with decreasing metallicity.
Field stars and GCs show similar mass loss at [Fe/H]=-0.50.
Mass loss cannot be accurately modeled by a single Reimers η value.
Abstract
Context. Asteroseismic investigations of solar-like oscillations in giant stars enable the derivation of their masses and radii. For mono-age mono-metallicity populations of stars this allows the integrated red giant branch (RGB) mass loss to be estimated by comparing the median mass of the low-luminosity RGB stars to that of the helium-core-burning stars (HeCB). Aims. We aim to exploit quasi mono-age mono-metallicity populations of field stars in the -rich sequence of the Milky Way (MW) to derive the integrated mass loss and its dependence on metallicity. By comparing to metal-rich globular clusters (GCs), we wish to determine whether the RGB mass loss differs in the two environments. Methods. Catalogues of asteroseismic parameters based on time-series photometry from the Kepler and K2 missions cross-matched to spectroscopic information from APOGEE-DR17, photometry from 2MASS,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstronomy and Astrophysical Research · Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies · Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
