Strategic Classification With Externalities
Safwan Hossain, Evi Micha, Yiling Chen, Ariel Procaccia

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new strategic classification model accounting for externalities among agents, providing theoretical foundations for learning classifiers robust to multiple interacting strategic agents.
Contribution
It models inter-agent externalities in strategic classification as a Stackelberg and simultaneous game, proving the uniqueness and computability of equilibrium, and establishing PAC learning guarantees.
Findings
Unique pure Nash Equilibrium can be efficiently computed.
Classifiers can be learned to minimize loss despite strategic manipulation.
Theoretical framework for classifiers robust to multiple strategic agents.
Abstract
We propose a new variant of the strategic classification problem: a principal reveals a classifier, and agents report their (possibly manipulated) features to be classified. Motivated by real-world applications, our model crucially allows the manipulation of one agent to affect another; that is, it explicitly captures inter-agent externalities. The principal-agent interactions are formally modeled as a Stackelberg game, with the resulting agent manipulation dynamics captured as a simultaneous game. We show that under certain assumptions, the pure Nash Equilibrium of this agent manipulation game is unique and can be efficiently computed. Leveraging this result, PAC learning guarantees are established for the learner: informally, we show that it is possible to learn classifiers that minimize loss on the distribution, even when a random number of agents are manipulating their way to a…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2025 Poster
I think the writing of the paper is fantastic! Also, the problem formulation is interesting.
Besides their novel formulation, their main result is their sample complexity result, but that seems to me to just be using a standard covering argument to bound the discretization error. Do you think you can get tighter bounds using other techniques like Rademacher complexity etc.?
In my opinion, the primary strength of the paper is modeling externality in strategic classification. I believe this aspect of externality has been missing in the long literature of strategic classification. The authors also did a good job at identifying a clean set of technical conditions (ell_2 norm costs, pairwise symmetric externalities, and convex total externality) for a unique Pure Nash Equilibrium. In particular, the conditions lead to a potential game formulation, enabling the use of
The paper's main weakness lies in its treatment of optimization. While the authors elegantly establish the existence and uniqueness of equilibria, they essentially punt on the crucial question of how to actually find the optimal classifier. Their argument - that gradient-based methods often work well for non-convex problems - feels particularly thin in this context. After all, we're not dealing with standard non-convexity here, but rather with a nested optimization where agents are reaching equi
I think that the problem tackled is very important and relevant. It is nice to see a problem arising from real-world concerns that is studied through a Econ-ML lens. By combining Stackelberg/Nash game theory concepts with externalities, the authors create a framework that captures both the principal-agent and multi-agent dynamics in a unified model. This approach positions the principal as a leader setting a classifier policy, followed by agents interacting with both the classifier and one anot
I think that the assumption of pairwise symmetric externalities is very limiting. Of course, it helps to obtain a model which exhibits nice results and gives Theorem 1 but it seems a bit far from a lot of real-world issues to me. “Equilibrium of Data Markets with Externality” is mentioned as a reference to justify this assumption but does not provide any material to motivate it. “How (Not) to Raise Money”, Goeree et al. is the other reference to justify this assumption, although they only mentio
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGlobal Trade and Competitiveness
