Constraints on compact objects from the Dark Energy Survey five-year supernova sample
Paul Shah, Tamara M. Davis, Maria Vincenzi, Patrick Armstrong, Dillon, Brout, Ryan Camilleri, Lluis Galbany, Juan Garcia-Bellido, Mandeep S.S.Gill,, Ofer Lahav, Jason Lee, Chris Lidman, Anais Moeller, Masao Sako, Bruno, O.Sanchez, Mark Sullivan, Lorne Whiteway, Phillip Wiseman

TL;DR
This study uses supernova lensing data from the Dark Energy Survey to place limits on the fraction of matter in compact objects over cosmological distances, providing new constraints independent of background cosmology.
Contribution
It presents the first constraints on the fraction of matter in compact objects using supernova lensing magnification data from DES, accounting for various cosmological priors and systematics.
Findings
Fraction of matter in compact objects < 0.12 at 95% CL
Results are robust against different cosmological priors
Constraints are likely conservative, with potential systematic effects discussed
Abstract
Gravitational lensing magnification of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) allows information to be obtained about the distribution of matter on small scales. In this paper, we derive limits on the fraction of the total matter density in compact objects (which comprise stars, stellar remnants, small stellar groupings and primordial black holes) of mass over cosmological distances. Using 1,532 SNe Ia from the Dark Energy Survey Year 5 sample (DES-SN5YR) combined with a Bayesian prior for the absolute magnitude , we obtain at the 95\% confidence level after marginalisation over cosmological parameters, lensing due to large-scale structure, and intrinsic non-Gaussianity. Similar results are obtained using priors from the cosmic microwave background, baryon acoustic oscillations and galaxy weak lensing, indicating our results do not depend on the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
