Deep and Probabilistic Solar Irradiance Forecast at the Arctic Circle

TL;DR

This paper develops and compares deep learning models, specifically LSTMs with probabilistic approaches, for accurate and uncertainty-aware solar irradiance forecasting near the Arctic Circle, demonstrating improved multi-horizon predictions.

Contribution

It introduces probabilistic LSTM models with advanced distribution fitting for solar irradiance forecasting in Arctic conditions, enhancing both accuracy and uncertainty quantification.

Findings

LSTMs outperform simple models and MLP in multi-horizon forecasts

Probabilistic models provide well-calibrated uncertainty estimates

Trade-off observed between point prediction accuracy and uncertainty calibration

Abstract

Solar irradiance forecasts can be dynamic and unreliable due to changing weather conditions. Near the Arctic circle, this also translates into a distinct set of further challenges. This work is forecasting solar irradiance with Norwegian data using variations of Long-Short-Term Memory units (LSTMs). In order to gain more trustworthiness of results, the probabilistic approaches Quantile Regression (QR) and Maximum Likelihood (MLE) are optimized on top of the LSTMs, providing measures of uncertainty for the results. MLE is further extended by using a Johnson's SU distribution, a Johnson's SB distribution, and a Weibull distribution in addition to a normal Gaussian to model parameters. Contrary to a Gaussian, Weibull, Johnson's SU and Johnson's SB can return skewed distributions, enabling it to fit the non-normal solar irradiance distribution more optimally. The LSTMs are compared against each other, a simple Multi-layer Perceptron (MLP), and a smart-persistence estimator. The proposed LSTMs are found to be more accurate than smart persistence and the MLP for a multi-horizon, day-ahead (36 hours) forecast. The deterministic LSTM showed better root mean squared error (RMSE), but worse mean absolute error (MAE) than a MLE with Johnson's SB distribution. Probabilistic uncertainty estimation is shown to fit relatively well across the distribution of observed irradiance. While QR shows better uncertainty estimation calibration, MLE with Johnson's SB, Johnson's SU, or Gaussian show better performance in the other metrics employed. Optimizing and comparing the models against each other reveals a seemingly inherent trade-off between point-prediction and uncertainty estimation calibration.