Optimal mutual insurance against systematic longevity risk
John Armstrong, James Dalby

TL;DR
This paper mathematically analyzes how two pension funds can mutually insure against systematic longevity risk through a market clearing condition, highlighting the impact of their risk preferences on insurance benefits.
Contribution
It introduces a formal framework for mutual insurance between pension funds against longevity risk, emphasizing the role of risk preferences and market conditions.
Findings
Mutual insurance is beneficial when funds have significantly different risk preferences.
The market clearing condition enables insurance exchange even with identical mortality risks.
Base schemes are nearly optimal if funds' preferences are similar.
Abstract
We mathematically demonstrate how and what it means for two collective pension funds to mutually insure one another against systematic longevity risk. The key equation that facilitates the exchange of insurance is a market clearing condition. This enables an insurance market to be established even if the two funds face the same mortality risk, so long as they have different risk preferences. Provided the preferences of the two funds are not too dissimilar, insurance provides little benefit, implying the base scheme is effectively optimal. When preferences vary significantly, insurance can be beneficial.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGlobal Health Care Issues · Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
MethodsBalanced Selection
