How Does Vision-Language Adaptation Impact the Safety of Vision Language Models?
Seongyun Lee, Geewook Kim, Jiyeon Kim, Hyunji Lee, Hoyeon, Chang, Sue Hyun Park, Minjoon Seo

TL;DR
This paper investigates how vision-language adaptation affects the safety of large vision-language models, revealing safety degradation and proposing weight merging as a solution to improve safety without sacrificing helpfulness.
Contribution
The study provides an in-depth analysis of safety impacts during VL adaptation and introduces weight merging to better balance safety and helpfulness in LVLMs.
Findings
Safety degrades during VL adaptation even with safe training data
Safety fine-tuning techniques mitigate risks but cause helpfulness reduction
Weight merging effectively reduces safety degradation while maintaining helpfulness
Abstract
Vision-Language adaptation (VL adaptation) transforms Large Language Models (LLMs) into Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) for multimodal tasks, but this process often compromises the inherent safety capabilities embedded in the original LLMs. Despite potential harmfulness due to weakened safety measures, in-depth analysis on the effects of VL adaptation on safety remains under-explored. This study examines how VL adaptation influences safety and evaluates the impact of safety fine-tuning methods. Our analysis reveals that safety degradation occurs during VL adaptation, even when the training data is safe. While safety tuning techniques like supervised fine-tuning with safety datasets or reinforcement learning from human feedback mitigate some risks, they still lead to safety degradation and a reduction in helpfulness due to over-rejection issues. Further analysis of internal model…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLanguage, Metaphor, and Cognition
