Unlocking the Capabilities of Thought: A Reasoning Boundary Framework to Quantify and Optimize Chain-of-Thought
Qiguang Chen, Libo Qin, Jiaqi Wang, Jinxuan Zhou, Wanxiang Che

TL;DR
This paper introduces a reasoning boundary framework (RBF) to quantify and optimize Chain-of-Thought reasoning in large language models, providing a new way to assess and improve complex reasoning capabilities.
Contribution
The work proposes a novel reasoning boundary framework with quantitative metrics and optimization strategies for CoT, addressing key challenges in understanding and enhancing LLM reasoning.
Findings
Validated the framework on 27 models and 5 tasks
Explained the effectiveness of 10 CoT strategies
Guided optimization of reasoning paths
Abstract
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has emerged as a promising approach for enhancing the performance of large language models (LLMs) on complex reasoning tasks. Recently, a series of studies attempt to explain the mechanisms underlying CoT, aiming to deepen the understanding of its efficacy. Nevertheless, the existing research faces two major challenges: (1) a lack of quantitative metrics to assess CoT capabilities and (2) a dearth of guidance on optimizing CoT performance. Motivated by this, in this work, we introduce a novel reasoning boundary framework (RBF) to address these challenges. To solve the lack of quantification, we first define a reasoning boundary (RB) to quantify the upper-bound of CoT and establish a combination law for RB, enabling a practical quantitative approach applicable to various real-world CoT tasks. To address the lack of optimization, we propose three…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsCognitive Science and Mapping · Complex Systems and Decision Making
