A Bers type classification of big mapping classes
Ara Basmajian, Yassin Chandran

TL;DR
This paper classifies big mapping classes of infinite type surfaces based on their dynamics on hyperbolic structures, revealing their properties, classifications, and implications for surface topology and Teichmüller theory.
Contribution
It introduces a classification of big mapping classes into three types based on their quasiconformal dynamics and analyzes the structure of hyperbolic structures on infinite surfaces.
Findings
The space of geodesically complete convex hyperbolic structures is connected and decomposes into Teichmüller subspaces.
Mapping classes are classified into three types: always quasiconformal, sometimes quasiconformal, and never quasiconformal.
Big mapping class groups cannot act on Teichmüller spaces with orbits like modular groups.
Abstract
For an infinite type surface , we consider the space of (marked) convex hyperbolic structures on , denoted , with the Fenchel-Nielsen topology. The (big) mapping class group acts faithfully on this space allowing us to investigate a number of mapping class group invariant subspaces of which arise from various geometric properties (e.g. geodesic or metric completeness, ergodicity of the geodesic flow, lower systole bound, discrete length spectrum) of the hyperbolic structure. In particular, we show that the space of geodesically complete convex hyperbolic structures in is locally path connected, connected and decomposes naturally into Teichm\"uller subspaces. The big mapping class group of acts faithfully on this space allowing us to classify mapping classes into three types ({\it always quasiconformal, sometimes quasiconformal,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFuzzy and Soft Set Theory
