The Hypertriton Puzzle in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions

TL;DR

This paper investigates the hypertriton yield puzzle in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, questioning the validity of thermal models given the hypertriton's small binding energy and large size, and explores possible formation mechanisms.

Contribution

It identifies the inconsistency of thermal models with hypertriton properties and proposes alternative formation scenarios involving compact quark droplets.

Findings

Thermal models conflict with hypertriton's large size and small binding energy.

Hypertriton yields are well described by thermal models despite theoretical inconsistencies.

Additional assumptions are needed to reconcile models with observations.

Abstract

The yields of hadrons and light nuclei in relativistic collisions of heavy-nuclei at a center of mass energy of 2.6 TeV can be described remarkably well by a thermal distribution of an ideal gas of hadrons and light nuclei interacting only via the decay of resonances. Given the particularly small binding energy of hypertritons relative to the temperature describing the yields (about 156 MeV), one might naturally expect hypertrions to dissociate in medium, making the agreement of hypertriton yields with thermal predictions highly puzzling. The puzzle is compounded by the fact that small binding energy is associated with the large size of the hypertriton. This size is on a similar scale to the overall size of the fireball and much larger than the length scale over which temperatures in the fireball vary over phenomenologically relevant amounts. This paper quantifies the tension this effect causes and shows that it is sufficiently large to render the thermal model inconsistent: its natural assumptions are in conflict with its outputs. The possibility that hypertritons are formed at freeze out as compact objects, quark droplets, that subsequently evolve into hypertritons is considered as a way to resolve the puzzle. It is noted that beyond making the assumption that compact quark droplets form, additional detailed dynamical assumptions which have not been justified are needed to make the thermal model work. The issue of why, despite these issues, the hypertriton is well described by a simple statistical description at freeze out is unresolved. Resolving the hypertriton puzzle is important as it may clarify whether the phenomenological success of the simple thermal model for yields accurately reflects the simple picture of the underlying physics on which it is based.