Integrating problem structuring methods with formal design theory: collective water management policy design in Tunisia

TL;DR

This paper presents a novel framework combining problem structuring methods and formal design theory to enhance participatory and innovative groundwater management policies in Tunisia, addressing stakeholder diversity and climate challenges.

Contribution

It introduces an integrated approach merging PSMs and P-KCP methodology, expanding policy options and fostering collaborative, adaptable water management solutions.

Findings

Generated new groundwater management practices using cognitive maps and value trees.

Expanded policy alternatives through integration of decision and design theories.

Provided a practical, replicable framework for participatory policy innovation.

Abstract

Groundwater management, especially in regions like Tunisia, is challenging due to diverse stakeholder interests and the dry structure of climate, which is extremely challenging for the sustainability of water resources. This paper proposes an innovative approach to policy design by merging Problem Structuring Methods (PSMs) and the Policy-Knowledge, Concepts, Proposals (P-KCP) methodology. Utilizing cognitive maps and value trees, the study aims to generate new collective groundwater management practices. Bridging decision theory and design theory, the study addresses the gap in new alternative generation and highlights the P-KCP's role in innovative policy design. Integrating PSMs and C-K theory, the framework expands policy alternatives and advocates for participatory approaches. It emphasizes adaptability across contexts, provides replicable process descriptions, and encourages the creation of unconventional policy solutions. Ultimately, this comprehensive framework offers a practical guide for policy innovation and collaboration.