Bias-Aware Conformal Prediction for Metric-Based Imaging Pipelines
Matt Y. Cheung, Tucker J. Netherton, Laurence E. Court, Ashok Veeraraghavan, Guha Balakrishnan

TL;DR
This paper investigates how bias affects conformal prediction intervals in medical imaging, proposing bias-aware methods to improve confidence measures in imaging pipelines for better clinical decision-making.
Contribution
It formalizes the impact of bias on symmetric and asymmetric conformal prediction intervals and provides guidelines for selecting optimal formulations in medical imaging applications.
Findings
Symmetric intervals are inflated by twice the bias magnitude.
Asymmetric intervals are unaffected by bias.
Empirical validation on CT reconstruction confirms theoretical results.
Abstract
Reliable confidence measures of metrics derived from medical imaging reconstruction pipelines would improve the standard of decision-making in many clinical workflows. Conformal Prediction (CP) provides a robust framework for producing calibrated prediction intervals, but standard CP formulations face a critical challenge in the imaging pipeline: common mismatches between image reconstruction objectives and downstream metrics can introduce systematic prediction deviations from ground truth values, known as bias. These biases in turn compromise the efficiency of prediction intervals, which is a problem that has been unexplored in the CP literature. In this study, we formalize the behavior of symmetric (where bounds expand equally in both directions) and asymmetric (where bounds expand unequally) formulations for common non-conformity scores in CP in the presence of bias, and argue that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models
