Correlations between azimuthal anisotropy and mean transverse momentum in pp, pPb, and peripheral PbPb collisions
CMS Collaboration

TL;DR
This study investigates the relationship between azimuthal anisotropy and mean transverse momentum in different collision systems at the LHC, revealing multiplicity-dependent correlation sign changes in small systems but not in larger or more complex ones.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed analysis of azimuthal anisotropy and transverse momentum correlations across pp, pPb, and PbPb collisions, highlighting the role of particle multiplicity and pseudorapidity separation.
Findings
Correlation coefficients change from negative to positive with decreasing multiplicity in pp and pPb.
Sign changes in correlations disappear when particles are separated in pseudorapidity.
Models with gluon saturation and hydrodynamics do not predict the observed sign changes.
Abstract
Correlations between azimuthal anisotropy and mean transverse momentum of charged particles in proton-proton (pp), proton-lead (pPb), and peripheral lead-lead (PbPb) collisions are presented as a function of charged particle multiplicity. The pp, pPb and PbPb collision data were collected using the CMS detector at the LHC with a center-of-mass energy per nucleon pair of 13, 8.16 and 5.02 TeV, respectively. The two- and four-particle cumulants for the second- and third-order Fourier anisotropy harmonics are correlated with the mean transverse momentum of charged particles on an event-by-event basis. In pp and pPb systems, the observed correlation coefficients based on two-particle cumulants are found to change from negative to positive values as the charged particle multiplicity decreases. The sign changes disappear when the correlated particles are required to be further apart in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
