Two-fund separation under hyperbolically distributed returns and concave utility functions
Nuerxiati Abudurexiti, Erhan Bayraktar, Takaki Hayashi, Hasanjan Sayit

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that under hyperbolic return distributions and broad utility functions, the optimal portfolio follows a two-fund separation principle, simplifying portfolio choice to a linear combination of a riskless asset and a mutual fund of risky assets.
Contribution
It establishes the two-fund separation theorem for hyperbolic distributions and broad utility functions, providing explicit expressions for the mutual fund of risky assets.
Findings
Two-fund separation holds under hyperbolic distributions.
Explicit formulas for the mutual fund of risky assets.
Optimal portfolios either lie on the boundary or are unique within convex domains.
Abstract
Portfolio selection problems that optimize expected utility are usually difficult to solve. If the number of assets in the portfolio is large, such expected utility maximization problems become even harder to solve numerically. Therefore, analytical expressions for optimal portfolios are always preferred. In our work, we study portfolio optimization problems under the expected utility criterion for a wide range of utility functions, assuming return vectors follow hyperbolic distributions. Our main result demonstrates that under this setup, the two-fund monetary separation holds. Specifically, an individual with any utility function from this broad class will always choose to hold the same portfolio of risky assets, only adjusting the mix between this portfolio and a riskless asset based on their initial wealth and the specific utility function used for decision making. We provide…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEconomic theories and models
MethodsSparse Evolutionary Training
