The Ni isotopic composition of Ryugu reveals a common accretion region for carbonaceous chondrites
Fridolin Spitzer, Thorsten Kleine, Christoph Burkhardt, Timo Hopp,, Tetsuya Yokoyama, Yoshinari Abe, J\'er\^ome Al\'eon, Conel M. O'D. Alexander,, Sachiko Amari, Yuri Amelin, Ken-ichi Bajo, Martin Bizzarro, Audrey Bouvier,, Richard W. Carlson, Marc Chaussidon, Byeon-Gak Choi

TL;DR
This study reveals that Ryugu and CI chondrites share similar Ni isotopic compositions, suggesting they originated from the same region in the early solar system's accretion disk, despite previous differences observed in other isotopic systems.
Contribution
It demonstrates that Ryugu and CI chondrites have indistinguishable Ni isotope anomalies, indicating a common accretion region and providing insights into dust grain incorporation during formation.
Findings
Ryugu and CI chondrites share similar Ni isotopic compositions.
Differences in isotopic compositions are linked to accretion efficiencies of FeNi metal grains.
CI chondrites likely formed later in the disk's lifetime, affecting their isotopic signatures.
Abstract
The isotopic compositions of samples returned from Cb-type asteroid Ryugu and Ivuna-type (CI) chondrites are distinct from other carbonaceous chondrites, which has led to the suggestion that Ryugu and CI chondrites formed in a different region of the accretion disk, possibly around the orbits of Uranus and Neptune. We show that, like for Fe, Ryugu and CI chondrites also have indistinguishable Ni isotope anomalies, which differ from those of other carbonaceous chondrites. We propose that this unique Fe and Ni isotopic composition reflects different accretion efficiencies of small FeNi metal grains among the carbonaceous chondrite parent bodies. The CI chondrites incorporated these grains more efficiently, possibly because they formed at the end of the disk's lifetime, when planetesimal formation was also triggered by photoevaporation of the disk. Isotopic variations among carbonaceous…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
