Enhancing Graph Self-Supervised Learning with Graph Interplay
Xinjian Zhao, Wei Pang, Xiangru Jian, Yaoyao Xu, Chaolong Ying,, Tianshu Yu

TL;DR
This paper introduces Graph Interplay (GIP), a simple yet effective method that enhances graph self-supervised learning by enabling direct graph-level communication through random inter-graph edges, leading to improved downstream task performance.
Contribution
The paper proposes GIP, a novel approach that significantly boosts GSSL performance by combining inter-graph message passing with theoretical manifold separation, and demonstrates its versatility across methods.
Findings
GIP outperforms existing GSSL methods on multiple benchmarks.
GIP can be integrated with various GSSL methods for additional gains.
Theoretically, GIP promotes structured embedding manifolds.
Abstract
Graph self-supervised learning (GSSL) has emerged as a compelling framework for extracting informative representations from graph-structured data without extensive reliance on labeled inputs. In this study, we introduce Graph Interplay (GIP), an innovative and versatile approach that significantly enhances the performance equipped with various existing GSSL methods. To this end, GIP advocates direct graph-level communications by introducing random inter-graph edges within standard batches. Against GIP's simplicity, we further theoretically show that \textsc{GIP} essentially performs a principled manifold separation via combining inter-graph message passing and GSSL, bringing about more structured embedding manifolds and thus benefits a series of downstream tasks. Our empirical study demonstrates that GIP surpasses the performance of prevailing GSSL methods across multiple benchmarks by…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2025 Conference Withdrawn Submission
Novelty: the main contribution of the paper is to investigate inter-graph augmentation in GCL for the first time, which is simple, effective and flexible. This paper is likely to be a ground-breaking work that provides a new perspective to the GCL community. Quality: the writing is easy to follow; the experimental results are extensive and impressive; the authors support their idea by theoretical analysis. Reproducibility: I confirm that the authors have provided detailed code to reproduce the r
1. Motivation: I do admit that inter-graph augmentation sounds interesting, but I think the motivation behind is still obscure due to the brief demonstration explaining it. The authors argued that conventional GCL augmentations overlook the characteristics of graph. While in GIP, edges between atoms of different molecules are added, which is still hard to interpret. The following questions arise: 1) How do the authors define “the peculiar and critical characteristics of graph data” in a more spe
Pros: 1. The paper tries to broaden the contextual landscape within which the learning model operates and proposes a new graph interplay framework. 2. The framework is simple and easy to follow. The paper also provide the theory analysis to show that GIP essentially performs a principled manifold separation via combining intergraph message passing. 3. As the paper claims, the proposed framework can be readily integrated into a GSSL framework.
Cons: 1. Is it p a hyper-parameter of the framework? Why create enhanced views of the graph through the stochastic inter-graph edges? Could use the fully-connected graph with different edge weights to instead? 2. The paper construct inter-graph within a batch? Is it the batch size an important hyper-parameter? How the batch size impact the model performance? 3. There are also some related work about inter-graph construction, the model should highlight the difference and the improvement compared
1. The paper is well written, clearly showing the model framework. 2. Theoretical analysis based on manifold separation is sound. 3. The empirical results on graph classification demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model.
1. The model treats batched graphs as super-nodes within a larger graph structure, employing a node-level contrastive objective to learn individual representations. While this approach is straightforward and potentially powerful, the technique of pooling graphs or subgraphs into super-nodes is not novel. 2. The paper does not clearly delineate how the GIP mechanism integrates with existing GSSL models. For instance, in the context of GRACE, it is unclear whether feature or edge perturbations sho
1. The paper is well-written and readable. 2. The method achieves significant performance gains on several benchmark datasets. 3. Extensive ablation study provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of different components of the proposed method. 4. The paper can empower GSSLs focusing on node-level tasks in graph-level tasks.
1. It may be debatable that the motivation for capturing "interplay" between graphs is not fully aligned with the method, which introduces arbitrary edges between graphs. Even if the authors have provided extensive experiments, I think the results do not focus on aligning the motivation and implementations. Also, there is no special consideration to differentiate inter-graph edges with intra-graph edges. This raises concerns about the validity of the "interplay" concept. It would be better to
1. The proposed GIP augmentation is simple and intuitive, friendly for following research. 2. The quality of writing is easy to follow.
1. Potential to violate double-blind policy. In the repo for code, "environment.yml" file contains the following information "prefix: /home/zhaoxinjian/miniconda3/envs/sgnn", where "zhaoxinjian" implies one of authors. 2. The results shown in Table 1 is too unimaginable to convince. In IMDB-MULTI, GRACE+GIP and BGRL+GIP nearly double the baselines performances. For BGRL+GIP for IMDB-BINARY and GRACE+GIP for PROTENINS, the performances are 99.80$\pm$0.40 and 99.40$\pm$0.85, which approach 100 but
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Neural Networks
